Minor grammer fix for SQL section, added answer to redundant question under MongoDB portion
This commit is contained in:
parent
c5639e3b02
commit
0bf07b3cb8
@ -2314,6 +2314,11 @@ If you want to get "101" you should use the package "strconv" and replace <code>
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
<details>
|
<details>
|
||||||
<summary>What is the difference between SQL and NoSQL?</summary><br><b>
|
<summary>What is the difference between SQL and NoSQL?</summary><br><b>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The main difference is that SQL databases are structured (data is stored in the form of
|
||||||
|
tables with rows and columns - like an excel spreadsheet table) while NoSQL is
|
||||||
|
unstructured, and the data storage can vary depending on how the NoSQL DB is set up, such
|
||||||
|
as key-value pair, document-oriented, etc.
|
||||||
</b></details>
|
</b></details>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
<details>
|
<details>
|
||||||
@ -2321,6 +2326,7 @@ If you want to get "101" you should use the package "strconv" and replace <code>
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
* Heterogeneous data which changes often
|
* Heterogeneous data which changes often
|
||||||
* Data consistency and integrity is not top priority
|
* Data consistency and integrity is not top priority
|
||||||
|
* Best if the database needs to scale rapidly
|
||||||
</b></details>
|
</b></details>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
<details>
|
<details>
|
||||||
@ -2643,7 +2649,7 @@ Inner JOIN cat_food f <br>
|
|||||||
ON c.Customer_ID = f.Customer_ID <br>
|
ON c.Customer_ID = f.Customer_ID <br>
|
||||||
where c.Customer_ID in (Select Customer_ID from cat_food);
|
where c.Customer_ID in (Select Customer_ID from cat_food);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Although this was a simple statement, the "with" clause really shines is when
|
Although this was a simple statement, the "with" clause really shines when
|
||||||
a complex query needs to be run on a table before joining to another. With statements are nice,
|
a complex query needs to be run on a table before joining to another. With statements are nice,
|
||||||
because you create a pseudo temp when running your query, instead of creating a whole new table.
|
because you create a pseudo temp when running your query, instead of creating a whole new table.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user